Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Cupp v. Warden, USP Hazelton
as 5:2024cv00145
Respondent:
Warden, USP Hazelton
Petitioner:
Steven Orville Cupp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jeter v. Warden, USP Hazelton
as 5:2024cv00139
Respondent:
Warden, USP Hazelton
Petitioner:
Jeffery Jeter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mohamed v. Warden, USPO Hazelton
as 5:2024cv00138
Respondent:
Warden, USP Hazelton
Petitioner:
Guled Mohamed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lewis v. Warden of USP Hazelton
as 5:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Vashun Lewis
Respondent:
Warden of USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wright v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Anthony Steven Wright
Defendant:
United States of America, USP Hazelton chaplain and USP Hazelton Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wright v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Anthony Steven Wright
Defendant:
United States of America, USP Hazelton Warden and DSCC Grand Prairie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Elrod v. USP Hazelton
as 5:2022cv00264
Petitioner:
Kevin Earl Elrod
Respondent:
USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brizuela v. USP Hazelton
as 1:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Felix Brizuela
Defendant:
USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Crawford v. USP Hazelton
as 5:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Shakeem Crawford
Defendant:
USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Humphrey v. USP - Hazelton Warden
as 5:2022cv00129
Petitioner:
Tony Andre Humphrey
Respondent:
USP - Hazelton Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
