Cases 1 - 10 of 210
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Wangs Alliance Corporation v. Minka Lighting, LLC
as 1:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
Wangs Alliance Corporation d/b/a WAC Lighting
Defendant:
Minka Lighting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Wang v. CCRM Fertility of Northern Virginia
as 1:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Zhongan Wang
Defendant:
CCRM Fertility of Northern Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Wang v. Zheng, et al
as 1:2024cv00910
Plaintiff:
Ourong Wang
Defendant:
Ziyu Zheng and Xiao Ling Wei
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Wang v. Gokhale
as 1:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Lana Wang
Defendant:
Dilip Gokhale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Wang v. Jaddou et al
as 1:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Yiying Wang
Defendant:
Ur Mendoza Jaddou and US-CIS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Hasan v. Shu Chung Wang
as 7:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Mohammad N. Hasan
Defendant:
Dr. Lawrence Shu Chung Wang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Claros Torres v. HTNR ELC INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Oscar Ronaldo Claros Torres
Defendant:
HTNR ELC INC., Bingfei Wang, HTNR ELC INC. doing business as Hot N Roll Ayce Sukiyak and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wilborn v. Wang et al
as 7:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dean Wilborn
Defendant:
Dr. Lawrence Shu Chang Wang, Dr. Ohia and Dr. Mark Amonette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilborn v. Wang et al
as 2:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dean Wilborn
Defendant:
Dr. Lawrence Shu Chang Wang, Dr. Ohia and Dr. Mark Amonette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
