Cases 1 - 10 of 11
COTE v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2024cv02859
Petitioner:
RICHARD PAUL COTE
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brogdon v. Graham
as 5:2024cv01706
Petitioner:
Conell Brogdon
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richman v. Graham
as 9:2024cv01635
Petitioner:
Ulysses Richman
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Godbee v. Graham
as 2:2024cv00702
Petitioner:
Burnett Godbee
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Townsend v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 8:2019cv02803
Defendant:
C.O. A. Connell, C.O. Carr, C.O. D. Frenzel and others
Plaintiff:
Devon Jamal Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bishop v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv00364
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Kristie M Bishop
Respondent:
Warden Graham Camille Griffin Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richard Lavonte Blanks, Sr. v. Warden Graham
as 16-7693
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD LAVONTE BLANKS, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN GRAHAM and BRIAN E. FROSH, The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Mason v. South Carolina
as 5:2015cv04963
Petitioner:
Julie Melton Mason
Respondent:
Warden, Graham Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sherinette Wannamaker v. Warden
as 14-7844
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHERINETTE WANNAMAKER, a/k/a Sheri Wannamaker
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, Graham Correctional Institution, Camille Griffin
Respondent:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Wannamaker v. Warden Graham Correctional Institution
as 9:2013cv02934
Petitioner:
Sherinette Wannamaker
Respondent:
Warden Graham Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.