Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Casto Land, Inc. et al v. City of Huntington, West Virginia et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Casto Land, Inc., Universal Holdings, LLC, Clifford Smith and others
Defendant:
City of Huntington, West Virginia, Steve Williams, Kathy Burks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilkins v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00943
Plaintiff:
Tony Wilkins
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plummer v. McDowell County
as 1:2017cv03920
Plaintiff:
Stephennie Lynn Plummer
Defendant:
McDowell County, Southwestern Regional Jail, Micheal D. Brooks, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toweson et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv03740
Plaintiff:
Susan Toweson , Rose Sykes , Dawn Vowiell and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilkins et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06554
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Wilkins and Albert Wilkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilkins v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05152
Plaintiff:
Martha Wilkins
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2016cv03814
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Adams, Joyce Adams, Joyce Kessinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilkins v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09327
Plaintiff:
Mary Wilkins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilkins v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv09008
Plaintiff:
Donna M. Wilkins
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilkins et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv05492
Plaintiff:
Tina Wilkins and Kevin Wilkins
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
