Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Alexander v. Unknown
as 7:2022cv00724
Plaintiff:
Antonari William Alexander
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Massengill et al
as 7:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Antonari William Alexander and Anton William Alexander
Defendant:
Sgt. Massengill, U. M. Collins, Lt. Sykes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Mullins et al
as 7:2020cv00752
Defendant:
A. Mullins, Harold Clarke, Sgt. S. Dutton and others
Plaintiff:
Antonari William Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosales et al v. Capital Interior Contractors et al
as 3:2020cv00916
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Rosales, Hector Polanco-Alvarez, Marcos Cabrera and others
Defendant:
Capital Interior Contractors, RDIC Incorporated and GTO Drywall
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
US v. William Alexander, Jr.
as 20-4464
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM ALEXANDER, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alexander v. Messer et al
as 7:2020cv00450
Defendant:
Kiser-Fuller, C/O Messer, C/O J. Mullins and others
Plaintiff:
Antonari William Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonari Alexander v. Boyd Parks
as 20-6331
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT G. A. ADAMS, SERGEANT J. M. MESSER, UNIT MANAGER MICHAEL YOUNCE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONARI WILLIAM ALEXANDER
Alexander v. Unknown
as 7:2019cv00784
Defendant:
Unknown
Plaintiff:
Antonari William Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Subpoena Duces Tecum to Verizon Wireless
as 8:2019cv02119
Petitioner:
William Alexander
In Re:
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
Plaintiff:
Paul Mack, Danita Ingram, Thomas Boone and others
Defendant:
Mark A. Magaw, Major Kathleen Mills, Christopher Murtha and others
Alexander v. Collins et al
as 7:2019cv00261
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, C/O Maloney, C/O Messer and others
Plaintiff:
Antonari William Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
