Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Reynolds v. Warden, FCI Beckley
as 5:2023cv00533
Petitioner: Donald Reynolds
Respondent: DSCC, FCI Beckley, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Vincent Frayer v. Warden
as 23-6054
Petitioner / Appellant: VINCENT FRAYER, JR.
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, FCI Beckley
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 22-6879
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, FCI Beckley
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams
as 22-6875
Plaintiff / Appellant: (CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee: UNKNOWN JANE OR JOHN DOE, Director, IRS Department of the Treasury, WILLIAMS, Reck Officer, FCI Beckley, FORREN, Lieutenant, FCI Beckley and others
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 22-6390
Petitioner / Appellant: (CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, FCI Beckley
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 22-6305
Petitioner / Appellant: (CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, FCI Beckley
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 22-6169
Petitioner / Appellant: (CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, FCI Beckley
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 22-6170
Petitioner / Appellant: (CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, FCI Beckley
David Crum v. D.L. Young We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-6995
Respondent / Appellee: D.L. YOUNG, Warden, FCI Beckley
Petitioner / Appellant: DAVID HALL CRUM
Michael Gorbey v. Lt. Brown
as 21-6848
Defendant / Appellee: OFFICER SMITH, Unit Manager Poplar Unit, LIEUTENANT MANNING, FCI Beckley, VEST, FCI Beckley and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Feather-Gorbey, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?