Cases 1 - 10 of 482
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hensley v. Teets, et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Catherine Hensley, as Administratrix of the Estate of Christopher Hensley,
Defendant:
Michael R Teets, Michael G Elizondo, Seth D Summey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pacheco v. Love et al
as 5:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Skyler Love, FNU Greene, Graylan Groce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacheco v. Love et al
as 5:2024ct03125
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Skyler Love, Deputy Greene, Graylan Groce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hines v. USA
as 3:2024cv00482
Petitioner:
Warren Eugene Hines, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rouse v. Godfrey et al
as 5:2024ct03115
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lindell Rouse
Defendant:
John Godfrey, Marshall Pike, Cathy Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. Goldsboro Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Darrell Hubbard
Defendant:
Goldsboro Police Department, Alvino Daniels, Eric Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emiabata et al v. Warren
as 5:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Philip Emiabata and Sylvia Emiabata
Defendant:
David M. Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. State of NC et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Respondent:
NC Department of Adult Public Safety, State of NC, NC Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Marshall Lee Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Treece v. Truitt et al
as 5:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Warren Britt Treece
Defendant:
Catherine Truitt, Andrew Houlihan, Terry Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
