Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Nicole Carrillo v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00745
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Justin H Carrillo v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00692
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Justin H Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carrillo-Majarro v. USA
as 3:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Noe Carrillo-Majarro
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gladis Carrillo v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2035
Petitioner:
GLADIS AMINDA CARRILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Torres et al v. Five Star Home Repair LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Morel Torres, Roberto Carlos Torres Torres, Edwin Bladimir Sanchez Ruan and others
Defendant:
Five Star Home Repair LLC, Poole Construction, Inc., J Poole Group and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
US v. Sergio Murillo
as 23-6510
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SERGIO CARRILLO MURILLO
Silvia Castro-Carrillo v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1323
Petitioner:
SILVIA ARACELY CASTRO-CARRILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Carrillo v. Megaro et al
as 5:2023ct03031
Plaintiff:
Aurelio R. Carrillo and Nicolas Olivares Pineda
Defendant:
Patrick Michael Megaro, Jaime Halscott, Joseph Easton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Jose Macias-Carrillo
as 22-4538
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL MACIAS-CARRILLO
Carrillo v. The United States of America
as 2:2022cv00361
Plaintiff:
Alessandra Carrillo
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
