Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Telly Bristol v. Olinger
as 24-6322
Plaintiff:
TELLY SAVALAS BRISTOL
Defendant:
NURSE PRACTITIONER OLINGER, DR. HAYNES, Psych Senior, BATEMAN, Assistant Warden and others
Levi Springer v. Warden David E. Anderson
as 22-7473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DAVID ANDERSON, ASSISTANT WARDEN JOSEPH D. BATEMAN, CHIEF OF SECURITY HOWARD SHARPE and others
Springer v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Warden David E. Anderson, Assistant Warden Joseph D. Bateman, Chief of Security Howard Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bristol v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
Telly Savalas Bristol
Defendant:
David Anderson, Dr. Olinger, Dr. Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farabee v. Artrip et al
as 7:2020cv00534
Defendant:
J. Doss, Captain Olinger, Michael Henderlite and others
Plaintiff:
Brian D. Farabee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Farabee v. James Lee
as 19-7467
Defendant / Appellee:
RN CRAIG ROLAND, DR. DANA HAYNES, Psychologist and Head of the "Intensive Diversionary Treatment Program", RN E. POWERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN DAMON FARABEE
Farabee v. Lee et al
as 7:2018cv00425
Plaintiff:
Brian D Farabee
Defendant:
Meredith Cary, Eric Madsen, Kimberly Olinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baldwin v. Hatcher et al
as 5:2017hc02130
Petitioner:
Floyd Baldwin
Respondent:
Lewis L. Hatcher and Andrea Olinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baldwin v. Dudley et al
as 5:2016ct03237
Plaintiff:
Floyd Baldwin
Defendant:
Chris Dudley, R. Norris, Lewis L. Hatcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
