Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Ouedraogo Gilles Patrick v. Kevin McAleenan, Secretary, et al
as 19-20187
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICK CONTRERAS, Director for the Houston Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office, ROBERT LACY, Warden for Core Civic Houston Processing Center, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
OUEDRAOGO WENDKUUNI GILLE PATRICK and OUEDRAOGO WENDKUUNI GILLES PATRICK
Miguel Benitez-Garay v. Dept. of Homeland Security, et al
as 19-50242
Respondent / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL BENITEZ-GARAY
Hilma Jezek v. Kevin McAleenan, Acting Secy, et al
as 19-20168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HILMA HAYDEE JEZEK
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK SIEGL, in his official capacity as the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Houston Field Office Director, LEE F. CISSNA, in his official capacity as the Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Sebastian Bacilio-Sabastian, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 19-50168
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL BIBLE, Field Office Director for the San Antonio District Office of ICE, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ROSE THOMPSON, Warden of the Karnes County Residential Center and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAUL US CASTRO, MANUEL SANTIAGO-LAINES, SEBASTIAN DOMINGO BACILIO-SABASTIAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 19-10219
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Santoyo v. Bexar Cty
as 19-50124
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL BIBLE, United States Immigration and Enforcement, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ENRIQUE M. LUCERO, Field Office Director for the San Antonio Field Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIO TRUJILLO SANTOYO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
