Cases 11 - 20 of 29
AHS Staffing, LLC v. Quest Staffing Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00402
Plaintiff:
AHS Staffing, LLC
Defendant:
Quest Staffing Group, Inc. , Jaclyn Ward , Michelle Swann and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Beck et al v. ISC Constructors LLC
as 1:2014cv00174
Plaintiff:
Lyle Dean Deskin, Manuel Alaniz Rios, Henry Alejandro Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
ISC Constructors LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Beck et al v. A&L Industrial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00556
Defendant:
ISC Constructors, LLC, Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services, Inc., PCL Industrial Construction Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Lyle Dean Deskin, Manuel Alaniz Rios, Henry Alejandro Gonzalez and others
Petitioner:
Motiva Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dominguez v. Lufkin Industries, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00047
Plaintiff:
Enrique Dominguez
Defendant:
Lufkin Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dominguez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2014cv00049
Petitioner:
Ramon P Dominguez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams et al v. Brock Services, Ltd.
as 1:2013cv00372
Plaintiff:
Clifford Matthew Adams , All Plaintiffs , Rios Manuel Alaniz and others
Defendant:
Brock Services, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Dominguez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2013cv00320
Petitioner:
Paulo Martinez Dominguez
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dominguez v Midwest Carrier Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00822
Plaintiff:
Arselia Dominguez
Defendant:
Midwest Carrier Inc and Mohamed Dahir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Dominguez v. Martin
as 1:2011cv00653
Petitioner:
Jose Juan Dominguez
Respondent:
M. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dominguez v. Upton
as 1:2010cv00330
Petitioner:
Ricardo Hector Dominguez
Respondent:
Jody Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
