Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Porter v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
as 9:2014cv00142
Petitioner:
Lewis Jay Porter
Respondent:
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bishop v. City of Denton TX et al
as 4:2014cv00608
Plaintiff:
Jason Bishop
Defendant:
City of Denton TX and Darius M Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Collette v. Porter et al
as 1:2014cv00358
Plaintiff:
Samuel Collette
Defendant:
A Porter, J Busby, FNU Burleigh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRIGHT REALTY, LLC v. Porter et al
as 4:2014cv00351
Plaintiff:
BRIGHT REALTY, LLC
Defendant:
Mark Porter and Mark Porter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
eDekka LLC v. The Net-A-Porter Group, LLC
as 2:2014cv00494
Plaintiff:
eDekka LLC
Defendant:
The Net-A-Porter Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Porter v. Daniels
as 1:2013cv00663
Petitioner:
Eric Porter
Respondent:
Warden Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Porter v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 4:2013cv00408
Plaintiff:
Eddie R Porter
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Counter_claimant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Counter_defendant:
Eddie R Porter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Payne v. Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel, LLP et al
as 4:2013cv00381
Plaintiff:
Dorcas A. Payne
Defendant:
Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel, LLP, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., McCarthy, Holthus & Ackerman, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Porter v. Fox et al
as 1:2013cv00269
Petitioner:
Richard Porter
Defendant:
John B Fox and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Porter v. Rivera et al
as 1:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Arnie Porter
Defendant:
C V Rivera and Gerardo Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
