Cases 111 - 120 of 165,739
Bazan v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00220
Petitioner:
Cristobal Bazan
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bailey v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 5:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
James Robert Bailey
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McMullan v. Tanner et al
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
William B. McMullan
Defendant:
Joel Tanner, Shane Bozeman, William Barrett and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Garrett
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Jefferson Co. Corr. Facility, Corrhealth L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kincaid v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
William D Kincaid
Defendant:
Nolan Bass and Asst Warden Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00120
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lyon v. Tovar
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Edward B Lyon, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, State Classification Committee TDCJ, Lynnette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Guevara v. Rowe
as 5:2024cv00128
Petitioner:
Rogelio Guevara
Respondent:
Kelly S. Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Flowers v. Lubbock County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Dukhan Flowers
Defendant:
Lubbock County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Portillo Campos v. Wingfield
as 3:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Luis Miguel Portillo Campos
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Wingfield
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
