Cases 31 - 40 of 165,830
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01481
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Curry v. Colbert
as 3:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Curry
Defendant:
D. Colbert
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Casterberry v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Anthony Lavelle Casterberry
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nobles v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00315
Petitioner:
Dennis Germaine Nobles
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. Perez et al
as 6:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Roman J. Henry
Defendant:
Sergio Perez, Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fregia, Sr v. Securus, TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00209
Petitioner:
Kirk Asa Fregia, Sr
Respondent:
Securus, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Ofilia Trevino et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Jerel Smith
Defendant:
District Clerk Ofilia Trevino and Ofilia Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. McPeters et al
as 4:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Vasquez
Defendant:
Udealor McPeters and Veronica Sierra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Anekwe
as 5:2024cv00640
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Senior Chaplin Paul Anekwe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCuin v. Pearl River County et al
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Jesse McCuin
Defendant:
Pearl River County and City of Picayune
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
