Cases 71 - 80 of 165,830
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01467
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Broyles v. Bruce
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Scottie Broyles
Defendant:
Sgt. Johnny Bruce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. City of McComb City Police Department
as 5:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Markez Delmont Smith
Defendant:
City of McComb City Police Department
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Cain et al
as 5:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
David Darnell Jackson
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Management and Training Corporation and Unknown Unknown
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v/ Larraga Solano
as 5:2024cv00092
Defendant:
Juan Victor Larraga Solano
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sims v. Bryan Collier et al
as 4:2024cv02180
Plaintiff:
Danny J. Sims
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Kristen Worman and Bruce Fredricks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Bobby Lumpkin et al
as 4:2024cv02178
Plaintiff:
Darren Tranell Hughes
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Harris County, Fort Bend County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Negron v. Lumpkin
as 24-50460
Petitioner:
Antonio J. Negron
Respondent:
State of Texas and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Bourg v. Terrebonne Parish Criminal Justice Complex et al
as 2:2024cv01466
Plaintiff:
Reggie Paul Bourg
Defendant:
Terrebonne Parish Criminal Justice Complex and Rhonda Ledet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Diggs v. Warden
as 6:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Diggs
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
