Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,497
Taylor v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00253
Petitioner: Casey Michael Taylor
Respondent: Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Thomas v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00147
Plaintiff: Destry Earl Thomas
Defendant: Bryan Collier, Senior Warden Adrian A. Amonett, Candice Hannel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff: Destry Earl Thomas
Defendant: Bryan Collier, Senior Warden Adrain A. Amonett, Assistant Warden Candice Hannel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00862
Plaintiff: Johnny Thompson, Jr
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loyd v. Caddo Correctional Center
as 5:2024cv00869
Plaintiff: Rickey T Loyd
Defendant: Warden Caddo Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Petty v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00249
Petitioner: Stanley Lanech Petty, Jr.
Respondent: Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
George v. Baysore
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff: Terrance George
Defendant: Warden D. Baysore
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robertson v. Bass
as 24-30395
Plaintiff: Keith Wayne Robertson
Defendant: Nolen Bass, Warden and Johnson, Assistant Warden
Thomas v. Quiroga et al
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff: Jewell Thomas
Defendant: Major Victor Quiroga and Sr. Warden Adrian Amonett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Hooper
as 24-30387
Petitioner: Brian K. Banks
Respondent: Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?