Cases 201 - 210 of 821
Mayes v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2016cv16149
Plaintiff:
Rosie Mayes
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
McDonald v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 2:2016cv15975
Plaintiff:
Sharon McDonald
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Trapani v. Y R C Inc et al
as 5:2016cv01507
Plaintiff:
Travis Trapani
Defendant:
Y R C Inc , Curtis Boswell , Old Republic Insurance Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sullivan v. Davidson Trucking Inc, et al
as 2:2016cv15847
Plaintiff:
Donald Ryan Sullivan
Defendant:
Davidson Trucking, Inc. , Travelers Casualty Company and National Railroad Passenger Corporation AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Moman v. Canadian National Railway Company, et al
as 2:2016cv15013
Defendant:
Canadian National Railway Company, Canadian National Railroad and Frankie Perry
Plaintiff:
Miles Moman
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Morgan v. Clark Gin Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00694
Plaintiff:
Robert Morgan
Defendant:
Clark Gin Service, Inc., Alvin W. Yeates, The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Morgan v. Clark Gin Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv14393
Plaintiff:
Robert Morgan
Defendant:
Clark Gin Service, Inc., State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Caroline Morgan v. USA
as 16-50956
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROLINE MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brantley v. The Blacklands Railroad
as 6:2016cv01078
Plaintiff:
David Brantley
Defendant:
The Blacklands Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Saenz v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co
as 5:2016cv00868
Plaintiff:
Robert Saenz
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Co
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
