Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Harold Blakely v. City of Laurel, et al
as 15-60718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD J. BLAKELY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LAUREL, SHANNON CARAWAY, Police Officer, DARLEAN NORRIS, Police Officer and others
Baltimore v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2015cv02009
Plaintiff:
Amber Baltimore
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, James W LeBlanc, Jerry Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fridge v. Marksville et al
as 1:2015cv01998
Defendant:
City of Marksville, Elster Smith, Jr, Charles Riddle, III and others
Plaintiff:
Ian Fridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Houston Independent School District
as 4:2015cv01395
Plaintiff:
Darryl Adams , Leslie Adams , Claudette Berry and others
Defendant:
Houston Independent School District
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
D'Aquin v. Norris et al
as 2:2015cv00761
Plaintiff:
Thomas L D'Aquin
Defendant:
John Fahrman , Catherine Kahrs, Brett Stoltz and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Garza et al v. Jackson Public School District et al
as 3:2015cv00158
Defendant:
Jackson Public School District, Eric Greene, Officer Dood and others
Plaintiff:
Garza, Mary Rose Short, Sarah Durling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
dAquin v. Norris et al
as 2:2015cv00549
Plaintiff:
Thomas L dAquin
Defendant:
Scott Norris, John Fahrman, Catherine Kahrs and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Blakely v. City of Laurel et al
as 2:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
Harold J. Blakely
Defendant:
City of Laurel, Shannon Caraway, Darlean Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Slaughter et al
as 1:2013cv00438
Defendant:
David Amerson, Brian Beach, Zachary Beck and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Norris
as 1:2012cv01158
Plaintiff:
Idella Mitchell
Defendant:
Attorney Randolph Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
