Cases 51 - 60 of 28,557
Jackson v. Harris County District Court
as 4:2024cv02090
Plaintiff:
Renee Jackson
Defendant:
Harris County District Court
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Pete v. Wainwright et al
as 2:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Norman Pete
Defendant:
Charles Gary Wain Wright, Assistant District Attorney, Powell Wingfield Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tamborello v. Town of Highland Park, Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01356
Plaintiff:
Sam C Tamborello
Defendant:
Town of Highland Park, Texas, William (Bill) Lindley, Tobin Maples and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gore et al v. Crispin, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Rene Gore and Suzanne Scholte
Defendant:
Rafael Crispin, Jr. and Willie Hubert Wingfield III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cantu et al v. Brennand et al
as 5:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Erik Cantu, Jr. and Emily Proulx
Defendant:
James Brennand and City of San Antonio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. State Bar of Texas
as 24-50255
Plaintiff:
Craig A. Washington
Defendant:
State Bar of Texas, Judith Gres Deberry, in her official and individual capacity, George Gallagher, in his official and individual capacity and others
Woodfork v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2024cv01422
Plaintiff:
Mallory Woodfork
Defendant:
Joseph P. Lopinto, III, Clinston Gadea, Ricky Fuentes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Payton v. The City of Ridgeland, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Jumanda Payton
Defendant:
The City of Ridgeland, Mississippi, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Talley v. Mumford et al
as 3:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Roderick Greer Talley
Defendant:
Gerald Mumford, Judge Johnnie McDaniels, Judge Kenneth Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
