Cases 61 - 70 of 149
Spencer et al v. Wilson et al
as 4:2018cv04563
Defendant:
Houston SPCA, Judge Edie Connelly, Robert "Bob" Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Faye Spencer and Dave Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carman v. County of Collin, Texas et al
as 4:2018cv00717
Defendant:
Stephen Howell, Cie Gardez, Kalyn Rosser and others
Plaintiff:
Amy Carman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain v. Paxton et al
as 1:2018cv00810
Defendant:
Judge Amy Meachum, Ken Paxton, Demetris Anastasiadis and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. McClain, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Wright et al
as 1:2018cv00754
Defendant:
Bob Schulman, Francessa Houck, Keelie Radar-Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Arlenda Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hedtke et al v. Waxahachie Independent School District et al
as 3:2018cv01779
Plaintiff:
Amy Hedtke, T.J. Fabby and Monica Nyenhuis
Defendant:
James Villarreal, Dusty Autrey, Joe Estes Langley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith et al v. City of Austin et al
as 1:2018cv00505
Defendant:
Art Acevedo, City of Austin, Sally Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Marina Conner, Julie Ann Nitsch and Amy Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
G.F. v. Plano ISD et al
as 4:2018cv00361
Defendant:
Plano Independent School District and Anne Fullerton
Plaintiff:
G. F. , William Ferguson and Amy Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maravi Moore v. Hank Whitman, et al
as 18-20069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARAVI MOORE, as next friend EH, the sibling of AH, as next friend ALH
Defendant - Appellee:
HANK WHITMAN, In his official and individual capacities, GREGG ABBOTT, in his official and individual capacities, LISA MCCARTNEY and others
Charron v. Troost et al
as 4:2017cv03618
Plaintiff:
Amy Charron
Defendant:
Kenneth Troost, Houston Police Department , Art Acevedo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
