Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Reece v. Murillo
as 22-50342
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Reece
Defendant / Appellee:
Christie Murillo, Jade Huffman, Cole Stapp and others
Bailey v. City of Minden et al
as 5:2022cv01181
Plaintiff:
Robby Dale Bailey
Defendant:
City of Minden, Terry Gardner, Steve Cropper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reece v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
James Reece
Defendant:
Michael Taylor, Loy Locke, Kye Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cheek v. Hill County, Texas et al
as 6:2021cv00396
Defendant:
Dana J. Allen, Kyle R. Cox, Hill County, Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Gwynne Cheek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reece v. Butt et al
as 1:2020cv01078
Defendant:
FNU Alvarado, John Doe, Ashlyn Kay Baker and others
Plaintiff:
James Reece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Verret v. Acadiana Criminalistics Laboratory Commission et al
as 6:2020cv01302
Defendant:
Kevin Ardoin, Acadiana Criminalistics Laboratory Commission d/b/a Acadiana Criminalistics Laboratory, Winnie Kurowski and others
Plaintiff:
Reece Richter and Roy Verret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jim Reece v. Diane Insley, et al
as 18-50296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIM REECE
Defendant - Appellee:
DIANE INSLEY, Individually and in official capacity as Director of San Marcos Public Library, JOHN DOE, No. 1, "Librarian", Individually and in official capacity, JANE DOE, No. 1, "Librarian", Individually and in official capacity and others
Reece v. Insley et al
as 1:2017cv00813
Defendant:
Marilyn Brister, Michael Cosentino, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Reece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fox v. Daniel et al
as 6:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Robert James Fox
Defendant:
Reece Daniel, The State of Texas, County of Cherokee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reece v. Thorn et al
as 3:2012cv02035
Plaintiff:
Temeka Reece
Defendant:
Jeffery Thorn and City of Dallas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
