Voting Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Eubanks v. Nelson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-10936
Plaintiff / Appellant: Travis Wayne Eubanks, a voter of Bexar County, Texas, Travis Eubanks, a voter of Bexar County, Texas, Kyle Strongin, a voter of Hood County, Texas and others
Defendant / Appellee: Jane Nelson, Texas Secretary of State, John B. Scott, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as the Texas Secretary of State, Jose "Joe" A. Esparza, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Deputy Secretary of State and others
Appellant: Anne Stone and Allyson Raskin
Vickers et al v. Harvey et al
as 4:2022cv02915
Plaintiff: Lauren Vickers, Kerrie Bloh and Lisa Webster
Defendant: Suzie Harvey, charlie Riley, Robert Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Strongin et al v. Scott et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00576
Plaintiff: Kyle Strongin, Lindsey Gremont, Christine Koepke and others
Defendant: John B. Scott, Jose "Joe" A. Esparza, Secretary of State of Texas and others
Not Classified By Court: Honorable Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jain v Coppell Independent School District et al
as 3:2016cv02702
Plaintiff: Dr. Pankaj Jain
Defendant: Coppell Independent School District , Leigh Walker, Anthony Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Cantue et al v. Beaumont Independent School District
as 1:2013cv00728
Defendant: Beaumont Independent School District
Plaintiff: Gary Cantue , Oveal Walker, III , Macarthur English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Hancock County Board of Supr, et al v. Karen Ruhr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-60614
Plaintiff - Appellant: HAZLEHURST, MISSISSIPPI BRANCH OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, NANETTE THURMOND-SMITH, PIKE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRANCH OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Movant - Appellant: PAMELA JEFFERSON, GREGORY PARTMAN, LASTER SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee: COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI DEMOCRATIC PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI REPUBLICAN PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee: JIM HOOD
Hancock County Board of Supr, et al v. Karen Ruhr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-60446
Plaintiff - Appellant: HAZLEHURST, MISSISSIPPI BRANCH OF THE NAACP, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, NANETTE THURMOND-SMITH, PIKE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRANCH OF THE NAACP, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI DEMOCRATIC PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI REPUBLICAN PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and others
Adams County Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Adams County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 5:2011cv00030
Plaintiff: Adams County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP and Jacqueline Marsaw
Defendant: Adams County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors , Adams County, Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee , Adams County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee and others
Intervenor_defendant: Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith, et al v. Clark, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2001cv00855
Plaintiff: John Robert Smith , Shirley Hall and Gene Walker
Defendant: Eric Clark , Mike Moore , Ronnie Musgrove and others
Intervenor_defendant: Beatrice J. Branch , Rims Barber , L C Dorsey and others
Movant: Jimmy D. Giles and Kenneth J. Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Type: Civil Rights Voting

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?