Cases 51 - 60 of 1,157
Haire v. Owen
as 23-10258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tiffany Haire
Defendant / Appellee:
Jennifer L. Owen, in her capacity as attorney for Higier Allen & Lautin
Cos v. Exact Sciences Corporation
as 4:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Dolores Cos
Defendant:
Exact Sciences Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rexrode v. Savvas Learning
as 1:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
Laurie Rexrode
Defendant:
Savvas Learning and Savvas Learning Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Meiske et al v. InterContinental Hotels Group
as 1:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Daniel Meiske and Hui Meiske
Defendant:
InterContinental Hotels Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Long v. The Dallas Housing Authority
as 3:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Long
Defendant:
The Dallas Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
United States of America v. MA Partners 2 et al
as 3:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
MA Partners 2, Brockbk JV LLC, Dallas Redevelopment Equities LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Brown et al
as 3:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Howard Brown and Brandon Sibley
Defendant:
Choctaw Resort Development Enterprise, Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, Chief Cyrus Ben and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith et al v. Allee et al
as 4:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Smith and Charles Smith
Defendant:
Matthew Allee and Aron Allee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Abita View Apartments LLC v. Carr
as 2:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Abita View Apartments LLC
Defendant:
Lashunda Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Turnipseed v. APMT
as 23-30037
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dory Turnipseed
Defendant / Appellee:
APMT, L.L.C., doing business as Tonti Management
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
