General Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 141 - 150 of 66,672
Thomas v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00150
Petitioner: Antoine Thomas
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01514
Petitioner: Michael William Davis
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00985
Petitioner: James McCoy
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Terry County Sheriff
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner: Charles Ray Gibson, Jr.
Respondent: Terry County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia-Romeo v. Colbert
as 3:2024cv00231
Plaintiff: Gonzalo Garcia-Romeo
Defendant: Warden D. Colbert
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00149
Petitioner: Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent: Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDonald v. Lumpkin
as 24-40269
Petitioner: Joseph Christopher McDonald
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 24-10362
Petitioner: Joseph Leonard Smith, Jr.
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Van Nortrick v. Hooper
as 24-30274
Petitioner: Roy Van Nortrick
Respondent: Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Barraza v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00138
Petitioner: Alex Barraza
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?