Cases 171 - 180 of 66,672
Darge v. Warden - Yazoo City Low
as 3:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Patrick Darge
Defendant:
Warden - Yazoo City Low
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Padilla v. Lumpkin
as 24-10365
Petitioner:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Pool v. Garcia
as 7:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Jeffery Lamont Pool
Respondent:
Juan Garcia and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nettles v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00980
Petitioner:
Donovan Nettles and Donavan Nettles
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01546
Petitioner:
Johnny Richardson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hubert v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
Lawrence Israel Hubert
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hampton v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jarivs Jerome Hampton, Jr. and Jarvis Jermaine Hampton, Jr.
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Hooper
as 5:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Phillip Orlando Ealy Johnson
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buckley v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Leon Buckley
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herrera v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00440
Petitioner:
Carlos Herrera
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
