Cases 11 - 20 of 230
Calderon v. Lumpkin
as 22-40817
Petitioner / Appellant:
Alexander Brandon Calderon
Respondent / Appellee:
Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Perez v. Hijar
as 22-50904
Petitioner / Appellant:
Alexander Isaiah Perez
Respondent / Appellee:
Sandra Hijar, Warden, FCI La Tuna
Weinert v. State of Texas
as 5:2022cv00263
Petitioner:
Steven Alexander Weinert
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Hijar
as 3:2022cv00324
Petitioner:
Alexander Isaiah Perez
Respondent:
Sandra Hijar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alexander v. Lumpkin
as 22-40498
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jasyn Alexander
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Alexander v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2022cv02256
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Alexander
Defendant:
Louisiana State
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv02060
Petitioner:
Allen Keith Alexander
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Cain
as 1:2022cv00062
Petitioner:
Brett Alexander Jones
Respondent:
Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00028
Petitioner:
Johnny Earl Alexander
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. Cooley
as 2:2022cv00517
Petitioner:
Jack Alexander Mason
Respondent:
Keith Cooley and Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
