Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Ballou v. Jacobs
as 5:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
John E Ballow, Jr and John E Ballou, Jr
Defendant:
Captain Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCall v. Jacobs et al
as 5:2021cv03695
Plaintiff:
Andrew McCall
Defendant:
Captain Jacobs and Sheriffs Office Bossier Parish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gray v. Beek et al
as 2:2021cv01800
Plaintiff:
Stephen Edward Gray
Defendant:
Capton Beek, Judge Rowen, Captain Beek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Sheriff Joe Berlin et al
as 2:2020cv00107
Plaintiff:
Kennon Aunri Johnson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Captain Jason R. Anderson, Sheriff Joe Berlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Romo v. TDCJ Wayne Scott Unit et al
as 3:2020cv00160
Respondent:
M. Ross, Officer Lindberg, Officer Partida and others
Petitioner:
Raul Romo, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Trojanowski v. Sheriff Tarrant County et al
as 4:2020cv00002
Defendant:
Captain (Unnamed) Tarrant County, Capt NFN Jones, Grievance Officials and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Armondo Trojanowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2019cv00468
Respondent:
R. Garcia, Captain Adewa, N. COIII and others
Petitioner:
Isaac Hudson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hudson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2019cv03510
Respondent:
R. Garcia, Captain Adewa, N. COIII and others
Petitioner:
Isaac Hudson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Drones v. TDCJ et al
as 4:2019cv00127
Respondent:
Employees, Director Gabbeaty, Psych Department and others
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Drones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Nash et al
as 3:2018cv00624
Defendant:
Captain Crawford, Dr. Martinez, Lt. Louglery and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Brown
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
