Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Knight v. Quarterman et al
as 1:2009cv00441
Petitioner:
Roy Knight
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman, J Edwards, L Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2008cv05103
Plaintiff:
Phillip Knight
Defendant:
Louisiana State
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knight v. Cain et al
as 2:2008cv04721
Plaintiff:
Keynel Knight
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knight v. Hood
as 1:2008cv00243
Plaintiff:
Armstrong Jacob Knight
Defendant:
Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knight v. Connick et al
as 2:2008cv03727
Plaintiff:
Phillip Knight
Defendant:
Paul D Connick, Jr
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knight v. Quarterman
as 08-40116
Petitioner - Appellant:
OLIVER KNIGHT
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Knight v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2007cv00391
Petitioner:
Oliver Knight
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv02604
Petitioner:
Oliver Barclay Knight
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. Warden et al
as 2:2007cv02801
Plaintiff:
Phillip Knight
Defendant:
Warden
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. Formen et al
as 2:2007cv01272
Plaintiff:
Phillip Knight
Defendant:
Richard Formen
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
