Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Lester v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00413
Petitioner:
Timmy Heath Lester
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lester v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
Timmy Heath Lester
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heath v. Rowe
as 2:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Larry Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. Harrison County, Mississippi
as 1:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Brian Heath Gomez
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kight v. Hooper
as 22-30737
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Heath Kight
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Spikes v. Martin
as 2:2022cv02568
Plaintiff:
James Jerrod Spikes, Jr.
Defendant:
Heath Martin
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barker v. Lumpkin
as 22-10733
Petitioner / Appellant:
Heath R. Barker
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Spikes v. Martin
as 2:2022cv02294
Plaintiff:
James Jerrod Spikes, Jr.
Defendant:
Heath Martin
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kight v. Vannoy
as 2:2022cv00584
Plaintiff:
Daniel Heath Kight
Defendant:
Darryl Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barker v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv00742
Petitioner:
Heath R Barker
Respondent:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
