Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Licon v. Sheriff of Ector County
as 7:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
Jose Cruz Licon
Respondent:
Sheriff of Ector County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cruz-Banegas v. TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01033
Petitioner:
Kenneth Said Cruz-Banegas
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
De La Cruz v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03965
Petitioner:
Andrea De La Cruz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz-Garcia v. Harrison
as 3:2023cv00603
Plaintiff:
Bernarl De La Cruz-Garcia
Defendant:
Warden C. Harrison
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Valencia-Adata v. F C I Oakdale II
as 2:2023cv01164
Plaintiff:
Cruz Eduardo Valencia-Adata
Defendant:
Warden F C I Oakdale II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cruz v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02224
Petitioner:
Erasto Cruz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
De La Cruz-Sotelo v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00526
Petitioner:
Israel De La Cruz-Sotelo
Respondent:
United States of America and Freddy Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ramirez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00003
Petitioner:
Benito Cruz Ramirez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz v. TDCJ et al
as 7:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
David Cruz
Defendant:
TDCJ, Sheriff Dept, Assistant Warden FNU Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Judge Garza
as 6:2022cv00018
Petitioner:
Victoriano Cruz Alvarado
Respondent:
Judge Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
