Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Rios v. The Tim Curry Center et al
as 4:2023cv00282
Petitioner:
Michael Rios
Respondent:
The Tim Curry Center, Acclaim Physicians, Pro Path Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Roberson v. Gadrey
as 23-10052
Petitioner / Appellant:
Billy John Roberson
Respondent / Appellee:
Michael Gadrey, Chief of Police, City of Rowlett Police Department, David Gill, Chief of Police, City of Mesquite and Texas Department of Criminal Appeals
Roberson v. Gadrey et al
as 3:2022cv02631
Petitioner:
Billy John Roberson
Respondent:
Michael Gadrey, David Gill and Texas Department of Criminal Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gill v. Lumpkin
as 22-10407
Petitioner / Appellant:
Rudolfo Gill
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Gill v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv02747
Petitioner:
Larry Dean Gill
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gill v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2021cv00033
Petitioner:
Larry Gill
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gill v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2021cv00083
Petitioner:
Larry Gill
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gill v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2020cv00634
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Anthony E Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gill v. Turner
as 1:2019cv00716
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Gill
Defendant:
Mississippi State Penitentiary and Marshall Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Izquirdo Martiato v. Barr et al
as 5:2019cv00101
Respondent:
Shawn Gills and W.B. Barr
Petitioner:
Pablo Yasel Izquirdo Martiato
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
