Cases 1 - 10 of 197
Hill v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Cedric Hill
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hill v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Gregory Marshall Hill
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hill v. Lumpkin
as 23-20479
Petitioner / Appellant:
Richard Michael Hill
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Hill v. Loden
as 2:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Russell K. Hill *DO NOT FILE* and Russell K. Hill
Defendant:
Warden C. Loden
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hill *DO NOT FILE* v. Loden
as 3:2023cv00293
Petitioner:
Russell K. Hill DO NOT FILE and Russell Keith Hill
Defendant:
Warden C. Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DeBoest v. Judge Josh Hill
as 4:2023cv01123
Petitioner:
DeAndre Dynell DeBoest
Respondent:
Judge Josh Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. USA
as 1:2022cv06113
Plaintiff:
Everette Hill
Defendant:
Warden and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Loden
as 4:2022cv00184
Petitioner:
Russell K. Hill
Respondent:
Warden C. Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hill v. Loden
as 2:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Russell K. Hill
Defendant:
Warden C. Loden
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Loden
as 4:2022cv00159
Petitioner:
Russell K. Hill
Respondent:
Warden C. Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
