Cases 1 - 10 of 437
Lugman v. Cox
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Abdul K Lugman
Defendant:
J W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Higgins v. Taylor County- Abilene, Texas et al
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Michael K Higgins
Defendant:
Taylor County- Abilene, Texas and 350th Court of Law
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Laneil Robertson
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Michael W Collier, Jennifer S Crozby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lynch v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01142
Plaintiff:
Bryan K Lynch
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Royal v. Gregg County et al
as 6:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Devin Benard Royal
Defendant:
Gregg County, Jeffery K. Hale and Gregg County District Clerk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lynch v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02662
Petitioner:
Bryan K Lynch
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. Louisiana State
as 23-30687
Petitioner / Appellant:
Charles K. Wallace
Respondent / Appellee:
Louisiana State
Sheldon v. Zook
as 23-10986
Petitioner / Appellant:
Gary Sheldon
Respondent / Appellee:
K. Zook, Warden
Hill v. Loden
as 2:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Russell K. Hill *DO NOT FILE* and Russell K. Hill
Defendant:
Warden C. Loden
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wallace v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2023cv05242
Plaintiff:
Charles K Wallace
Defendant:
Louisiana State
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
