Cases 1 - 10 of 241
Flowers v. Lumpkin
as 24-10486
Petitioner:
Matthew Lee Flowers
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Matthews v. Federal Medical Center Warden
as 4:2024cv00405
Petitioner:
Eric Martin Matthews
Respondent:
Federal Medical Center Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01387
Petitioner:
Matthew Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00804
Petitioner:
Matthew Thomas Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Matthew Thomas Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. Federal Medical Center Warden
as 4:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Eric Martin Matthews
Respondent:
Federal Medical Center Warden and Warden at FMC Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sanchez v. LNU 5:24-CV-035-H
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Matthew Quinton Sanchez
Respondent:
FNU LNU 5:24-CV-035-H
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McMurtry v. Gregg County Sheriff
as 6:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Justin Matthew McMurtry
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ and Gregg County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cunningham v. Hughes
as 1:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Matthew Cunningham
Respondent:
Langford Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKellop v. Warden of FMC Fort Worth
as 4:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Jeffrey McKellop
Respondent:
DOJ, Thomas A. Dibiase, Matthew Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
