Cases 1 - 10 of 287
Corrales v. Robinson
as 24-40398
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Corrales
Respondent:
S. Robinson, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute Beaumont Low
Crotts v. Robinson
as 24-20014
Petitioner:
Alan Nelson Crotts
Respondent:
Reginald Robinson, Director of the Fort Bend Community Supervision and Corrections Department
Robinson v. Warden, FMC
as 4:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
Raymond Robinson, III
Respondent:
Warden, FMC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Reynolds v. Robinson
as 23-30923
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Michael Reynolds
Respondent:
Alvin Robinson, Warden, Nelson Coleman Correctional Center and Louisiana State
Robinson v. Warden, FMC
as 1:2023cv00449
Petitioner:
Raymond Robinson, III
Respondent:
Warden, FMC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Reynolds v. Robinson
as 23-30847
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jeffrey Michael Reynolds
Respondent / Appellee:
Alvin Robinson, Warden, Nelson Coleman Correctional Center and Louisiana State
Robinson v. Hooper
as 2:2023cv05310
Plaintiff:
Brandon Nycole Robinson
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Baysore et al
as 3:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Tony Robinson
Defendant:
Warden D. Baysore, FBOP and Attorney General
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Smith
as 23-10053
Petitioner / Appellant:
Royal Douglas Robinson
Respondent / Appellee:
Jimmy S. Smith, Senior Warden and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Robinson v. Goodwin
as 23-30020
Petitioner / Appellant:
Arthur Ray Robinson
Respondent / Appellee:
Jerry Goodwin, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
