Cases 1 - 10 of 567
Torres v. Lumpkin
as 24-20254
Petitioner:
Steven Cecillio Torres
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Tatum v. Lumpkin
as 24-20219
Petitioner:
Steven Tatum
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rudluff v. Rosalez
as 1:2024cv00373
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Steven Rudluff
Respondent:
Warden G. Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Duvall v. Gregg County Sheriff
as 6:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Steven Lee Duvall
Respondent:
Gregg County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Easter v. Court Room 485th District Court et al
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jordan Easter and Jordan Beavers
Defendant:
Court Room 485th District Court, Judge Steven James and DA Jamie Jernigan
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Duvall v. Gregg County Sheriff
as 6:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Steven Lee Duvall
Respondent:
State Of Texas and Gregg County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fowler v. Colbert
as 3:2023cv03112
Plaintiff:
Steven Fowler
Defendant:
Warden Colbert
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tatum v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04025
Petitioner:
Steven Tatum
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Louisiana
as 6:2023cv01502
Plaintiff:
Steven Bell
Defendant:
Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dillard v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00198
Petitioner:
Steven Dale Dillard
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
