Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Flanagan v. Edenfield et al
as 1:2010cv00160
Plaintiff:
Michael Flanagan
Defendant:
K. Edenfield, Harley Lappin, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2010cv00847
Plaintiff:
Anthony McQueen
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNELLGROVE v. LAPPIN et al
as 5:2010cv00054
Plaintiff:
WESLEY SNELLGROVE
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Bruce Pearson and T. MASON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowman v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv02167
Plaintiff:
James Bowman
Defendant:
Harley Lappin and Office of the Inspector General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Wall v. Black, et al
as 09-60871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WALL
Defendant - Appellee:
BLACK, JACKSON, Counselor, BRUCE PEARSON and others
Watts v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv00930
Plaintiff:
Michael L Watts
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Tim Outlaw, Bruce Sasser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Okpala v. Lappin et al
as 1:2009cv00828
Plaintiff:
Okey Garry Okpala
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, John B. Fox, Constanle Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
James Rockett v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 09-30536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ROCKETT
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Director and others
Charles Johnson v. United States Attorney General, et al
as 09-30371
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES W JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, HARLEY LAPPIN, G MALDONADO, JR. and others
WALL v. BENDER et al
as 5:2009cv00050
Plaintiff:
Robert Wall
Defendant:
BENDER, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
