Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hayes v. Rayford
as 23-50181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abraham Bundu Hayes
Defendant / Appellee:
Phonso Rayford, Warden, Jesus Avalos, Correctional Officer IV and Jordan Portillo, Former Lieutenant of John B. Connally Unit
Avalos, Jr. v. Striblin et al
as 9:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Feliciano Avalos, Jr.
Defendant:
Kimberly K Striblin, Donald E. Muniz, Kurtis D. Pharr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Rayford et al
as 5:2021cv01039
Plaintiff:
Abraham Bundu Hayes
Defendant:
Phonso Rayford and Jesus Avalos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Rayford et al
as 2:2021cv00244
Plaintiff:
Abraham Bundu Hayes
Defendant:
Phonso Rayford and Jesus Avalos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solomon v. Rayford et al
as 5:2021cv00351
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Larissa S. Wysocki, Phonso J. Rayford and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Solomon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardora Roberson v. Rayford et al
as 5:2021cv00051
Defendant:
Larissa S. Wysocki, Phonso J. Rayford, Nurudeen O. Ogunrinola and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Cardora Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avalos v. Monroe et al
as 6:2018cv00206
Plaintiff:
Johnny Avalos
Defendant:
C E Monroe, William T Mullins, Oliver K Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Fort Worth Police Department
as 4:2017cv00259
Plaintiff:
Roberto Avalos Rodriguez
Defendant:
Fort Worth Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avalos v. Lucio et al
as 1:2016cv00220
Plaintiff:
Carlos Avalos
Defendant:
Omar Lucio, Medical Staff, Names Unknown, Unknown John Doe Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avalos v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00513
Plaintiff:
The Undersigned Prisoners and Mario Avalos
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
