Cases 11 - 20 of 136
Plaquemines Prsh v. Chevron USA
as 23-30364
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor / Appellee:
Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris and Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant / Appellant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Chevron Oil Company, The California Company, and Gulf Oil Corporation, Shell Offshore, Incorporated, Shell Oil Company and others
Plaquemines Prsh v. ConocoPhillips
as 23-30303
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor / Appellee:
Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris
Defendant / Appellant:
ConocoPhillips Company, As Successor in Interest to Conoco, Incorporated, Exxon Mobil Corporation, As Successor in Interest to Exxon Corporation and Humble Oil and Refining Company, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., As Successor in Interest to Gulf Oil Corporation and The California Company and others
Plaquemines Prsh v. BP America Prod
as 23-30294
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor / Appellee:
Louisiana State and Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant / Appellant:
BP America Production Company, As Successor in Interest to Amoco Production Company, Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company, L.P., Chevron USA, Incorporated, As Successor in Interest to Chevron Oil Company, The California Company and Gulf Oil Corporation and others
Plaquemines Prsh v. Exxon Mobil
as 23-30188
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor / Appellee:
Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris and Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant / Appellant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, as successor in interest to Exxon Corporation and Humble Oil and Refining Company, ConocoPhillips Company, as successor in interest to General American Oil Company of Texas, Phillips Oil Company, Phillips Petrleum company, U.S. Oil of Louisiana, Incorporated, Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Gulf Oil corporation and The California Company and others
Plaquemines Prsh v. Chevron USA Hold
as 23-30156
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Defendant / Appellant:
Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated, As Successor in interest to Humble Oil and Refining Company, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Texas Company and others
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv00513
Defendant:
John Rodriguez and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Prevent U.S.A. Corporation v. Volkswagen AG et al
as 2:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Prevent U.S.A. Corporation
Defendant:
Volkswagen AG and Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al v. Cox Oil Offshore LLC
as 3:2022cv00792
Petitioner:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Union Oil Company of California
Respondent:
Cox Oil Offshore LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
State of Texas v. Becerra et al
as 5:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
State of Texas, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists and Christian Medical & Dental Associations
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
New York State, California State of, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
