Cases 41 - 50 of 195
R.J. Reynolds Vapor v. FDA
as 23-60037
Petitioner:
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C., Avail Vapor Texas, L.L.C. and others
Respondent:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert Califf, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the United States Food & Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
State of Texas et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
State of Texas and State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary Xavier Becerra, Marvin Figueroa and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Emanuel McCray
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
State of Texas
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lifenet, Inc. et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc., AIR METHODS CORPORATION, Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Medical Association et al. v. US Department of Health and Human Services et al.
as 6:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
US Department of Health and Human Services,, Department of Labor, Department of the Treasury and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Office of Personnel Management, Kiran Ahuja, Janet Yellen and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc., Air Methods Corporation, Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
Emergency Department Practice Management Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Louisiana v. Becerra
as 22-30748
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health & Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children & Families and others
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant:
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, M.D., Janet Woodcock, M.D. and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Danco Laboratories, LLC and Danco Laboratories LLC
Amicus Curiae:
The Chattanooga National Memorial for the Unborn, Doctors for America, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Vapor Train 2 LLC et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 6:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
Vapor Train 2 LLC and Magellan Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, M.D., U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Informed Consent Action Network v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al
as 1:2022cv01130
Plaintiff:
Informed Consent Action Network
Defendant:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
State of Texas v. Becerra
as 22-11037
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists and Christian Medical & Dental Associations
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
