Cases 41 - 50 of 197
The State of Texas v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 7:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas and Mayo Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra and United States Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
R.J. Reynolds v. FDA
as 23-60128
Petitioner:
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C., Avail Vapor Texas, L.L.C. and others
Respondent:
United States Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant:
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, M.D., Janet Woodcock, M.D. and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Danco Laboratories, LLC and Danco Laboratories LLC
Amicus Curiae:
The Chattanooga National Memorial for the Unborn, Doctors for America, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
R J Reynolds Tobacco v. FDA
as 23-40076
Plaintiff / Appellee:
R J Reynolds Tobacco Company, Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Incorporated, ITG Brands LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Stephen M. Hahn, Commissioner of Food and Drugs and others
Apter et al v. Department Of Health And Human Services et al
as 3:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Apter, Mary Talley Bowden and Paul E. Marik
Defendant:
Department Of Health And Human Services, Xavier Becerra, Food and Drug Administration and others
Amicus Curiae:
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons and America's Frontline Doctors
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Copperas Cove LTC Partners v. HHS
as 21-60892
Petitioner:
Copperas Cove LTC Partners, Incorporated
Respondent:
United States Department of Health and Human Services
FILING ERROR
as 1:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra and United States Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
R.J. Reynolds Vapor v. FDA
as 23-60037
Petitioner:
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C., Avail Vapor Texas, L.L.C. and others
Respondent:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert Califf, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the United States Food & Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Texas Medical Association et al. v. US Department of Health and Human Services et al.
as 6:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
US Department of Health and Human Services,, Department of Labor, Department of the Treasury and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Office of Personnel Management, Kiran Ahuja, Janet Yellen and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc., Air Methods Corporation, Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
Emergency Department Practice Management Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lifenet, Inc. et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc., AIR METHODS CORPORATION, Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
