Cases 21 - 30 of 89
Cypers v. Bankcard Central LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00382
Defendant:
Bankcard Central LLC, Rev 19 LLC, Larry Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Rory Justin Cypers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Bankcard Central LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00212
Defendant:
Bankcard Central LLC, Larry Daniels, Rev 19 LLC and others
Cypers v. Bankcard Central LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00213
Petitioner:
Rory J Cypers and Rory Justin Cypers
Defendant:
Larry Daniels, Rev 19 LLC, Payment Holdings LLC and others
Armstrong et al v. Kimberly Clark Corporation
as 3:2020cv03150
Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Melissa Armstrong, Roland Nadeau, Sandra Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Hopper et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2020cv02838
Plaintiff:
Linda Driscoll, Mark Hudson, Ronald Weckwerth and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Fernando Gonzalez, Michael Hunter, Jerry D White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hunter et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2020cv02843
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gutierrez, Donald Rau, Harvey Michael Grisham and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nerwich et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2020cv02844
Plaintiff:
Charles Hipple, Patricia Whitaker, Mazen Samman and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bloodworth v. Fitzgerald et al
as 2:2020cv00304
Defendant:
Laura Fitzgerald and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Danielle Bloodworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Daniels v. Infiniti Financial Services
as 4:2020cv00976
Defendant:
Infiniti Financial Services
Plaintiff:
Amos M. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Daniel T.A. Cotts, PLLC v. American Bank, N.A.
as 2:2020cv00185
Plaintiff:
Daniel T.A. Cotts PLLC
Defendant:
American Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
