Cases 91 - 100 of 151
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv03529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01077
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ortiz v. Montgomery County, Texas et al
as 4:2016cv03357
Plaintiff:
Brian Ortiz
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Texas, Brett Ligon, Phil Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Martinez v. Corrections Corporation of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00575
Plaintiff:
Landon Martinez
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Inc., Board of Directors for Corrections Corporation of America, Fred Figueroa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00419
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Lewis v. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department et al
as 1:2016cv00128
Plaintiff:
Troy Keith Lewis
Defendant:
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and Grant Klien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Galvan v. Calhoun County et al
as 3:2015cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jose Galvan
Defendant:
Calhoun County , George Aleman , Phoenix Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Galvan v. Calhoun County et al
as 6:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Jose Galvan
Defendant:
Calhoun County , George Aleman , Phoenix Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Smith v. Carruth et al
as 2:2015cv04570
Defendant:
Grant Carruth, Amite City, Amite City Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Felisha Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
