Cases 101 - 110 of 165
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Barbara Hoffmann, et al v. Marion County Texas, et al
as 13-41199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARBARA E. HOFFMANN and FRED LULLING
Defendant - Appellee:
MARION COUNTY TEXAS, HUMANE SOCIETY OF MARION COUNTY, JEFFERSON ANIMAL CLINIC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Scott Minnick v. Britney Lane, et al
as 13-50839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT MINNICK
Defendant - Appellee:
BRITNEY LANE and EVETTE ALEXANDER
Minnick v. Lane et al
as 1:2013cv00480
Defendant:
Evette Alexander and Britney Lane
Plaintiff:
Scott Minnick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stier v. Perry et al
as 1:2013cv00412
Defendant:
Gregg Abbott, Austin Police Chief Art Acevedo, Shirley Arnold-Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Heather A. Stier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young et al v. West Point, Mississippi, Municipal Election Commission et al
as 1:2013cv00099
Plaintiff:
Chiketa Young , Larry Stevenson , Kiara Lane and others
Defendant:
West Point, Mississippi, Municipal Election Commission , Municipal Election Committee , Betty Swift and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00313
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-30519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
