Cases 11 - 20 of 136
Arthur et al v. City of Jackson et al
as 3:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Garry Arthur, Keith Freeman and Robert Watts
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Jackson Police Department and Chief James Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Coleman v. Freeman
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Brittney Coleman and **Sanctioned/Barred* Brittney Coleman
Defendant:
Bernard Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Sharpless v. Dr Pepper Freeman et al
as 3:2022cv02283
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clay Sharpless
Defendant:
Dr Pepper Freeman, New Thief Store Employ, Thief Giant Employ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Winningham v. Blount et al
as 3:2022cv01752
Plaintiff:
Glenn Winningham
Defendant:
Cory Blount, Steve Carpenter, D Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tatom v. Whittington et al
as 5:2022cv01615
Plaintiff:
Travis Tatom
Defendant:
Julian C Whittington, Travis Buckmaster, Matthew Peace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Moore et al v. City of Laurel, Mississippi et al
as 2:2021cv00072
Plaintiff:
Porsche Moore and Dezsie Moore
Defendant:
Seth Crabtree, Tommy Cox, John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
