Cases 11 - 20 of 3,900
Lim v. NY State Board
as 24-10447
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Talley v. Jackson State University et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Roderick Greer Talley
Defendant:
Jackson State University and Eric Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morrison v. University of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
Susan D Morrison
Defendant:
University of Texas, State of Texas, Thomas Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sturgeon v. Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas in his Official Capacity, Only et al
as 4:2024cv01907
Plaintiff:
Paul Sturgeon
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas in his Official Capacity, Only, Texas State Attorney General and Harris County Texas Commission Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lafta v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Lafta
Defendant:
State of Texas, Travis County, Heman Marion Sweatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Bey v. State of Texas
as 4:2024cv01929
Plaintiff:
Antoine Davis Bey
Defendant:
State of Texas and Christopher G Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lin v. Wray
as 24-10420
Plaintiff:
Ke-Wei Lin
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, United States Department of Justice, (CA), Chad Yarbrough and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-30304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gilbert v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Kosciuszko Gilbert
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
