Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00307
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Smart v. City of Sachse, TX et al
as 3:2013cv03456
Plaintiff:
Melissa Smart
Defendant:
City of Sachse, TX , Dennis Veach and Kenneth Paul Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv02496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Robinson v. National Smart Healthcare Services, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00673
Plaintiff:
Heather Robinson
Defendant:
National Smart Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Gilliam v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 2:2010cv01989
Plaintiff:
Arielle M. Gilliam
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Housing Authority of New Orleans and Smart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Smart v. Shinseki, et al
as 3:2010cv00116
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Defendant:
Joan Ricard, Eric K. Shinseki and Dr. Loran Wilkenfeld
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Smart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smart v. Ellis County Texas
as 3:2010cv00080
Plaintiff:
Phillip Stewart Smart
Defendant:
Ellis County Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Michael Smart v. Eric Holder, et al
as 09-50796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SMART
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC HOLDER, Attorney General, Department of Justice, KATHERINE ANN LEHMANN, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, Department of Justice, JOHNNY E. MURPHY, Acting U.S. Attorney and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Smart v. Holder et al
as 3:2009cv00101
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Smart
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Johnny Sutton and Katherine Lehmann
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
