Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Trey Clayton v. Tate County School District, et al
as 13-60608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TREY CLAYTON, a minor, by and through his natural mother Dana Hamilton
Defendant - Appellee:
TATE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, JAMES MALONE, in his official capacity as Conservator of Tate County Schools and in his individual capacity and JEROME MARTIN, in his official capacity as Assistant Principal and in his individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv02089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patton et al v. Nordstrom Inc
as 3:2012cv01920
Defendant:
Nordstrom Inc
Plaintiff:
Erica Patton and Deshee Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mayfield v. Malone et al
as 3:2011cv02116
Plaintiff:
Henry W Mayfield
Defendant:
Rodney Malone, Jack Wright, Keith R Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clayton v. Tate County School District et al
as 2:2011cv00181
Plaintiff:
Trey Clayton
Defendant:
Tate County School District, James Malone and Jerome Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Ringer & Lingold and Copiah Bank NA
as 3:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Earnest Malone
Defendant:
Ringer & Lingold and Copiah Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Malone v. Ringer & Lingold and Copiah Bank NA
as 3:2010cv00089
Plaintiff:
Earnest Malone
Defendant:
Ringer & Lingold and Copiah Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
