Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-30084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Morris, et al vs Unified Housing Foundation Inc, et al
as 3:2010cv00125
Plaintiff:
Albert O Morris , Tilda Morris and Stephanie Morris
Defendant:
Unified Housing Foundation Inc, Sunchase American Ltd, Dennis Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01256
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv01256
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-20345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wallace et al v. Gregg County, TX et al
as 2:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
Tammy Wallace, Chelsie D. Wallace and Colton M. Wallace
Petitioner:
Kathryn M. Mosley
Defendant:
Gregg County, TX, Maxey Cerliano, Rodney Burns and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv05465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv01406
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Roca et al v. Pugh et al
as 6:2007cv00081
Plaintiff:
Sandra Renee Roca, Sandra Renee Roca, Tonya Burns and others
Defendant:
Larry Pugh, Mark Johnson and City of Jacksonville, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
