Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Harris et al v. Polk County,Texas et al
as 6:2013cv00412
Plaintiff:
Florida Harris , Sylvester Harris , Fred M. Davis and others
Defendant:
Polk County,Texas, Kenneth Hammack, Michael D. Nettles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aikman v. Kirk et al
as 6:2013cv00126
Plaintiff:
Devorah L. Aikman
Defendant:
Jody Gillum, Sheriff Ben Kirk, Deputy FNU Lantz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jasmine Montgomery v. Gretchen Bataille, et al
as 12-40932
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASMINE MONTGOMERY
Defendant - Appellee:
GRETCHEN BATAILLE, JOHN BARCELO, CHRIS DEATON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Addison et al v. Port Arthur Independent School District et al
as 1:2012cv00218
Plaintiff:
Shawn Addison, Jr. , Decarlos Kennerson , Frank Men and others
Defendant:
Port Arthur Independent School District and Raymond Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polk v. St. Bernard Parish
as 2:2012cv00448
Plaintiff:
Kylie T. Polk
Defendant:
St. Bernard Parish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Elijah Ratcliff v. State of Texas, et al
as 11-40917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIJAH W RATCLIFF
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, CITY OF LIVINGSTON, TEXAS, POLK CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT and others
Elijah Ratcliff v. State of Texas, et al
as 11-50594
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIJAH W RATCLIFF
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, CITY OF LIVINGSTON, TEXAS and POLK CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
